Below is a summary of the above video: Comparing the Sony 85mm f/1.4 vs Fujinon XF56mm f/1.2 and Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 vs Fujifilm 16-55mm f/2.8. Sony has some more clarity and punchy colors, but they used Provia in this comparison and could have switched profiles. The extra MP gives the Sony more clarity and they are pixel peeping. has continuous autofocus when recording movies. Canon EOS M50. Fujifilm X-T100. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. has a microphone input. Canon EOS M50. Fujifilm X-T100. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack. has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack. Fujifilm X100V. Sony A7C. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. has a stereo microphone. Fujifilm X100V. Sony A7C. A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone. Has timelapse function. Has phase-detection autofocus for videos. Fujifilm X-T20. Sony A7 II. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. has continuous autofocus when recording movies. Fujifilm X-T20. Fujifilm X-A10 advantages over Fujifilm X-A7. Less expensive. $500 vs $700 (MSRP) Save money for lenses or accessories. Bigger pixels. ~ 4.82 vs 3.92 microns. Better low-light and dynamic range The X-A7 is Fujifilm's first good entry-level mirrorless ILC. Back when Fujifilm announced the X-A5 in early 2018, it sounded like a really appealing entry-level ILC; in terms of spec, at least. It had a time-tested 24MP APS-C sensor, on-sensor PDAF, a flip-up touchscreen display, 4K video capture, a mic socket and great battery life am1K.

fujifilm xa7 vs fujifilm xt100